Civic Technology
Civic technology is an exciting development in the future of the relationship between communities, technology and government. Civic technology brings together open civic data, technology and a set of practices that emphasize citizen involvement, coproduction and collaboration. Some of the practices involved include Fellowships and Brigades, Hackathons and Civic Hacking and involvement of many sectors in planning and development.
Websites
Alliance of Civic Technologists https://www.civictechnologists.org/
The Association Civic Tech Europe (ACTE) https://acte-europe.org/
Civic Tech Lab https://civictech.us/
Civic Tech Reading List https://abhinemani.com/civictechcourse/readings/
Code for America https://www.codeforamerica.org/
Emerson College Engagement Lab https://elab.emerson.edu/
The Knight Foundation https://knightfoundation.org/
Living Cities https://www.livingcities.org/
My Society https://www.mysociety.org/
Tichtec Knowlege Base https://tictec.mysociety.org/resources/
UNC Civic Technology Microsite https://www.sog.unc.edu/resources/microsites/civictech (John B. Stephens)
Bibliography
Aguerre, C., & Bonina, C. (2023). Open government, civic tech and digital platforms in Latin America: A governance study of Montevideo's urban app ‘Por Mi Barrio’. Information Systems Journal. DOI: 10.1111/isj.12468
Aitamurto, T., Chen, K., Cherif, A., Galli, J. S., & Santana, L. (2016, October). Civic CrowdAnalytics: Making sense of crowdsourced civic input with big data tools. In Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (pp. 86-94). ACM.
Alvarado Garcia, A., Young, A. L., & Dombrowski, L. (2017). On Making Data
Actionable: How Activists Use Imperfect Data to Foster Social Change for
Human Rights Violations in Mexico. Proceedings of the ACM on
Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1-19.
Aragón, P., Alvarado Garcia, A., Le Dantec, C. A., Flores-Saviaga, C., & Saldivar, J. (2020, October). Civic Technologies: Research, Practice and Open Challenges. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 537-545).
Baack, S. (2018). Civic tech at mySociety: How the imagined affordances
of data shape data activism. Krisis,
(1).
Balestrini, M., Rogers, Y., Hassan, C., Creus, J., King, M., & Marshall,
P. (2017, May). A city in common: a framework to orchestrate large-scale
citizen engagement around urban issues. In Proceedings of the 2017
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.
2282-2294).
Baccarne, B., Evens, T., & De Marez, L. (2020). Understanding Civic Crowdfunding as a Mechanism for Leveraging Civic Engagement and Urban Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(5), 51-66.
Bhanye, J., & Shayamunda, R. (2025). The Promise of Civic-Tech: Digital
Technologies and Transparent, Accountable Governance. In Digitalisation
and Public Policy in Africa: GovTech and CivicTech Innovations (pp.
93-122). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Boehner, K., & DiSalvo, C. (2016, May). Data,
design and civics: An exploratory study of civic tech. In
Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems (pp.
2970-2981). ACM.
Chatwin, M., & Mayne, J. (2020). Improving Monitoring and Evaluation in the Civic Tech Ecosystem: Applying Contribution Analysis to Digital Transformation. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 12(2), 216-241.
Cheruiyot, D., Baack, S., & Ferrer-Conill, R. (2019). Data journalism beyond legacy media: The case of African and European civic technology organizations.
Digital Journalism, 7(9), 1215-1229.
Chung, A., Woo, H., & Lee, K. (2021). Understanding the information
diffusion of tweets of a non-profit organization that targets female
audiences: an examination of Women Who Code's tweets. Journal
of Communication Management, 25(1),
68-84.
Cinnamon, J. (2023). On data cultures and the prehistories of smart
urbanism in “Africa’s Digital City”. Urban
Geography, 44(5),
850-870.
Clark, B. Y., & Brudney, J. L. (2019). Citizen Representation in City Government-Driven Crowdsourcing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28(5), 883-910.
Corbett, E., & Le Dantec, C. A. (2019). ‘Removing Barriers’ and ‘Creating Distance’: Exploring the Logics of Efficiency and Trust in Civic Technology. Media and Communication, 7(3), 104-113.
Corbett, E., & Le Dantec, C. (2021, May). Designing Civic Technology with Trust. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-17).
Crittenden, C. (2023). Delivering democracy. Science, 381(6654), 132-132.
Dabo, A., & Pouyé, R. (2022). Assessing Civic Tech That Works to Build# TheAfricaWeWant.European Democracy Hub. https://europeandemocracyhub.epd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Civic-tech-in-Africa-v3.pdf
David, N., Justice, J.B. & McNutt, J.G. (2018). Smart Cities, Transparency, Civic Technology and Reinventing Government.[19-34]. In M. P Rodríguez Bolívar ed. Smart Technologies for Smart Governments. Transparency, Efficiency and Organizational Issues. edited by Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar. Berlin: Springer.
David, N., & McNutt, J. (2019). Building a Workforce for Smart City Governance: Challenges and Opportunities for the Planning and Administrative Professions. In Informatics. 6 (4), 47.
Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15-27.
Dietrich, D. (2015). The role of civic tech communities in PSI reuse and open data policies. European Public Sector Information Platform Topic Report, 5, 2015.
Duberry, J. (2022). AI and civic tech: Engaging citizens in decision-making processes but not without risks. In
Artificial Intelligence and Democracy (pp. 195-224). Edward Elgar Publishing.Gilman, H. R. (2016). Participatory budgeting and civic tech: The revival of citizen engagement. Georgetown University Press.
Gilman, H. R. (2017). Civic tech for urban collaborative governance. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(3), 744-750.
Golsteijn, C., Gallacher, S., Capra, L., & Rogers, Y. (2016, June). Sens-Us: Designing innovative civic technology for the public good. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 39-49). ACM.
Gordon, E., & Lopez, R. A. (2019). The practice of civic tech: Tensions in the adoption and use of new technologies in community based organizations. Media and Communication, 7(3), 57-68.
Gordon, E., & Mihailidis, P. (Eds.). (2016).
Civic media: Technology, design, practice.
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Graeff, E. E. C. (2018). Evaluating civic technology design for citizen empowerment (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Graeff, E. (2018). The Need for Empowerment-based Design in Civic Technology. In The Internet, Policy & Politics Conference.
Graeff, E., & Matias, J. N. (2015, February). Making drones civic.
Values and design principles for civic technology. In International
Studies Association’s 56th Annual Convention, New Orleans, LA.
Hamm, A., Shibuya, Y., Pargman, T. C., Bendor, R., Hansen, N. B., Raetzsch,
C., ... & Schouten, B. (2023). Failed yet successful: Learning from
discontinued civic tech initiatives.. In
Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems (CHI EA ’23),
April 23–28, 2023, Hamburg, Germany. ACM, New York, NY, USA.
Hawken, S., Leao, S. Z., Gudes, O., Izadpanahi, P., Viswanath, K., & Petit,
C. (2020). Safer cities for women: Global and local innovations with Open
Data and civic technology. In Open Cities| Open Data (pp. 85-105).
Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
Hébert, M. K. (2014). Come hack with me: Adapting anthropological training to work in civic innovation. Practicing Anthropology, 36(2), 32-36.
Hendler, J., Sosnik, O., Prudner, G., Chernicoff, D., McCarthy, J., Ree, O., & Keefe, C. (2016). Engines of Change: What Civic Tech Can Learn from Social Movements. Omidyar Network, 1-52.
Hintz, A., Dencik, L., Redden, J., & Trere, E. (2023). Civic participation in the datafied society: Introduction.
International Journal of Communication, 17, 3549-3561.Hou, Y. (2016, February). Understand the design and implementation of civic technologies in public organizations. In
Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (pp. 147-150). ACM.Hou, Y., & Lampe, C. (2017, June). Sustainable hacking: characteristics of the design and adoption of civic hacking projects. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (pp. 125-134). ACM.
Hou, Y., & Wang, D. (2017). Hacking with NPOs: collaborative analytics and broker roles in civic data hackathons. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 53.
Husain, S. O., Franklin, A., & Roep, D. (2019). Decentralizing geographies of political action: civic tech and place-based municipalism.
Journal of Peer Production, 13.
Johnson, I. G., Puussaar, A., Manuel, J., & Wright, P. (2018).
Neighbourhood Data: Exploring the Role of Open Data in Locally
Devolved Policymaking Processes. Proceedings of the ACM on
Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1-20.
Johnson, P. & Robinson, P. (2014). Civic hackathons: Innovation,
procurement, or civic engagement?.
Johnson, P. A., Robinson, P. J., & Philpot, S. (2020). Type, tweet, tap, and pass: How smart city technology is creating a transactional citizen. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101414.
Justice, J.,
McNutt, J.G. Melitski,
J., Ahn, M.,
David, N.,
Siddiqui, S. & Ronquillo, J.C. (2018). The Civic Technology Movement:
Implications for Nonprofit Theory and Practice. (89) In
McNutt, J.G.
(ed)
Technology, Activism and Social
Justice in a Digital Age. London & New York:
Oxford University Press.
Knutas, A., Palacin, V., Maccani, G., & Helfert, M. (2019, May).
Software engineering in civic tech a case study about code for Ireland.
In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software
Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (pp. 41-50). IEEE
Press.
Knutas, A., Jullien, N., Sańko, W., Saltan, A., Siemon, D., Tran, T., & Hyrynsalmi, S. (2025). Success Factors in Civic Tech Grassroots Software Ecosystems: Preliminary Findings from an Exploratory Case Study. In Proceedings of the 23rd EUSSET Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).
Kontokosta, C. E. (2016). The quantified community
and neighborhood labs: A framework for computational urban science and civic
technology innovation. Journal of Urban
Technology,
23(4), 67-84.
Kontokosta, C. E., & Malik, A. (2018). The Resilience to Emergencies and Disasters Index: Applying big data to benchmark and validate neighborhood resilience capacity. Sustainable cities and society, 36, 272-285.
Kwon, K. H., Shao, C., & Nah, S. (2021). Localized social media and
civic life: Motivations, trust, and civic participation in local
community contexts. Journal of Information Technology & Politics,
18(1), 55-69.
Living Cities (2012).
Cities, L. (2012). Field scan of civic technology. Living
Cities
Mačiulienė, M., & Skaržauskienė, A. (2020). Building the capacities of civic tech communities through digital data analytics. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 244-250.
Mather, L. W., & Robinson, P. (2022). Durable Civic Technology:
Minecraft as a Tool in Urban Planning Public Consultation. In Research
Anthology on Citizen Engagement and Activism for Social Change (pp.
608-630). IGI Global.
May, A., & Ross, T. (2018). The design of civic technology: factors that
influence public participation and impact.
Ergonomics,
61(2),
214-225.
McCord, C. W., & Becker, C. (2023). Beyond Transactional Democracy: A
Study of Civic Tech in Canada. arXiv
preprint arXiv:2302.06651.
McKenna, H. P. (2017). Civic tech and ambient data in the public realm:
challenges and opportunities for learning cities and smart cities. In Distributed,
Ambient and Pervasive Interactions: 5th International Conference, DAPI
2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
July 9–14, 2017, Proceedings 5 (pp.
312-331). Springer International Publishing.
McMillan, D., Engström, A., Lampinen, A., & Brown, B. (2016, May). Data
and the City. In
Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2933-2944). ACM.
McNutt, J. G., & Goldkind, L. (2020). Civic Technology and Data for
Good: Evolutionary Developments or Disruptive Change in
E-Participation?. In Digital Government and Achieving E-Public
Participation: Emerging Research and Opportunities (pp. 124-142).
IGI Global.
McNutt, J.G.,
Justice, J.B.,
Melitski, M.J,
Ahn, M.J., Siddiqui, S, Carter, D.T. & Kline, A. D. (2016).
The diffusion of civic technology and open government in the United
States.
Information Polity 21:
153-170.
Mellon, J., Sjoberg, F. M., Peixoto, T., & Lueders, J. (2025). The haves and the have nots: Civic technologies and the pathways to government responsiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 42(1), 102007.
Meng, A., DiSalvo, C., & Zegura, E. (2019). Collaborative Data Work Towards a Caring Democracy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-23.
Nah, S., & Yamamoto, M. (2017). Civic technology and community building: Interaction effects between integrated connectedness to a storytelling network (ICSN) and Internet and mobile uses on civic participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(4), 179-195.
Peixoto, T., & Sifry, M. L. (2017). Civic tech in the global south: assessing technology for the public good.World Bank https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/3d195678-ac78-536e-9c2c-c269f1b48ed2
Robinson, P. J., & Johnson, P. A. (2016). Civic hackathons: New terrain for local government-citizen interaction?. Urban Planning, 1(2), 65-74.
Rumbul, R. (2016, September). ICT and citizen efficacy: the role of civic
technology in facilitating government accountability and citizen confidence.
In IFIP World Information Technology Forum
(pp. 213-222). Springer, Cham.
Rumbul, R. (2015). Who Benefits From Civic Technology? Demographic and public attitudes research into the users of civic technology. London: mySociety.
Rumbul, R. (2016). Developing transparency through digital means? Examining institutional responses to civic technology in Latin America. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 8(3), 12-31.
Rumbul, R. (2016). Developing transparency through digital means? Examining institutional responses to civic technology in Latin America. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 8(3), 12-31.
Saldivar, J., Parra, C., Alcaraz, M., Arteta, R., & Cernuzzi, L. (2018).
Civic Technology for Social Innovation.
Computer Supported
Cooperative Work (CSCW),
27(3-6), 1215-1253.
Schrock, A. R. (2019). What is Civic Tech? Defining a Practice of Technical Pluralism. In The Right to the Smart City (pp. 125-133). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Shayamunda, R., & Bhanye, J. (2025). Digital Democracy in Action: Impact of Civic Tech Innovation on Public Service Delivery. In Digitalisation and Public Policy in Africa: GovTech and CivicTech Innovations (pp. 183-208). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Skarzauskiene, A., & Maciuliene, M. (2017, July). Towards
Sustainable Civic Technologies: Mapping the Lithuanian
Ecosystem. In ECSM 2017 4th European Conference on Social
Media (p. 273). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
Skaržauskienė, A. (2022). Monitoring collective intelligence in
Lithuania’s online communities. In Proceedings
of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences|
2022 (pp.
357-365). University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Skaržauskienė, A., & Mačiulienė, M. (2020, October). Mapping international civic technologies platforms. In Informatics . 7,(4),. 46- https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7040046
Shaw, E. (2018). Skipping Ahead to the Good Part: The Role of Civic Technology in Achieving the Promise of E-Government. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 10(2), 74-96.
Shibuya, Y., Hamm, A., & Raetzsch, C. (2021). From data to discourse: How
communicating civic data can provide a participatory structure for
sustainable cities and communities. In International
Sustainable Development Research Society Conference.
MISC.
Sieber, R. E., & Johnson, P. A. (2015). Civic
open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges.
Government Information Quarterly,
32(3),
308-315.
Sifry, M., Stempeck, M. & Simpson, E. (2016). Civic tech field guide. https://civictech.guide/
Stepasiuk, T. (2014). Civic hacking: A motivational perspective. New Visions in Public Affairs, 6, 21-30.
Stephens, J. (2017).
Civic Technology: Open Data and Citizen Volunteers as
a Resource for North Carolina Local Governments.
Chapel Hill, NC:
School of Government, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Wilson, C. (2020). The socialization of civic participation norms in government?: Assessing the effect of the Open Government Partnership on countries'e-participation. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101476.
Wirtz, B. W., Daiser, P., Thomas, M. J., & Schmöe, M. (2018). Open government implementation: an exploratory survey of public administration officials. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 10(4), 359-381.
Wissenbach, K. R. (2019). Accounting for power in transnational civic tech activism: A communication-based analytical framework for media practice. International Communication Gazette, 1748048519832779.
Yoshida, M., & Thammetar, T. (2021). Education between govtech and civic tech. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(4), 52-68.
Yoo, D. (2025). Political civic tech in South Korea and civic hackers’ rearticulation of digital citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 1-19.
Yuan, Q. (2019, June). Co-production of Public Service
and Information Technology: A Literature Review. In
20th Annual
International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 123-132).
ACM.
Zhang, W., Lim, G., Perrault, S., & Wang, C. (2022). A Review of Research on
Civic Technology: Definitions, Theories, History and Insights. arXiv
preprint arXiv:2204.11461.